[ Previous ] Home Page | 1996 Index | 1997 Index | 1998 Index | Next ]
Eschatology and a United Earth:
does our future blind us to opportunities?
by Justin D. Long
There's probably no thornier issue facing many Christians today than the prospect of a global government. Should we have one? Should we not? Will it be the spark of global Christian persecution? or will it spell the end of persecution, war and terrorism for everyone?
The reality is: as long as there are diplomatic relationships between nations, there will be some form of "global system" that at the very least deals with such issues as international responses to war, humanitarian crises, disease, economic trade and the like. In truth, such a system, with the appropriate checks and balances, is a good deterrent to a world empire. And, the more organized this system is, the more advantages there will be worldwide for travel, tourism, responses to persecution, humanitarian relief, community development, and communications.
That's not to say that there isn't an inherent danger in a global government. Any world system formed by man, no matter what the reason, is inevitably going to be flawed, because we are sinful, selfish creatures. It doesn't take an Antichrist to be greedy, selfish, or desire power over o thers.
Should men and women who operate from a Christian worldview help form such a government? Well, that's another issue entirely--one that has to be resolved in each of our own hearts and minds, and in open debate. There are some good reasons for being involved in the evolution of the United Nations--if only to try and help guard it from going down the wrong path.
The issue that we should face here is not whether we should be involved in a global government, but whether it offers advantages to those of us involved in frontier missions.